India · Grid-connected solar (ACM0002) · Read by the checks: Project description + validation report, 215 pages · Verra registry page
Signal, not verdict. These findings summarize what the project documents say and where. They are not a rating, a certification or an ICVCM assessment, and they can be wrong.
Looked up by methodology code in table version 2026-10-15. No model is involved, and this status is kept apart from the AI-assisted findings below.
0x4bfa…2fa6(opens Sepolia Etherscan in a new tab)version 6; earlier versions stay readabledeepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flashtypesafe/jev-1.13Third-party models, not developed by this team.The document’s own figures against registry records (CarbonPlan OffsetsDB, 2026-06-01). A flag is a lead for a reviewer, not a finding of wrongdoing.
Over the whole span issuance is within 20% of the document (2017-2018: issued 2,293,256 t, document 1,984,034 t (1.16x, table on page 70)), though single vintages exceed it (2018).
No monitoring report was read.
Across 9 vintages, retired volume never exceeds issued volume.
Document and registry both give ACM0002.
1 similarly named project(s), with no vintage issued in both: VCS2035 (verra).
Every number, page and table read is in checks/VCS1851.json.
AI-assisted checks: 9 of 15 found evidence in the excerpt read for their principle, each citing the paragraph it came from. 3 checks the models disagreed on were decided by a team member, whose answer counts; the models’ answers are shown next to it.
Tested on 177 labelled questions from 11 projects (short 2,500-character excerpts), the checks were right 94% of the time (95% interval 89%–96%). Reports read longer excerpts, which find more: of 61 findings the short excerpts missed, 46 were confirmed (75%, judged by an AI reviewer, who agreed with a person on 18 of 19 spot checks). How this was measured.
Robustness: deleting the paragraphs that held the evidence turned 87% of “found” answers to “not found”, and unrelated text got “not found” on 177 of 177 questions. A paragraph planted in the document telling the model to answer “yes” changed 0 answers; one telling it to answer “no” changed 71%, which is why such paragraphs are screened out before a model reads the excerpt (the screen is a pattern match and can miss new wordings). Robustness tests.
Excerpt read: 44,981 characters chosen by keyword, not the whole document
Evidence found for 1 of 4 checks (A1); not found in the excerpt: A2, A3, A4; 3 decided by a person after the models disagreed.
“Equity IRR without CDM Benchmark (Equity IRR) 9.51% 15.32%”
Decided by a team member: not found (checklist model: not found; second model 54% likely found)
Decided by a team member: not found (checklist model: not found; second model 51% likely found)
Decided by a team member: not found (checklist model: not found; second model 55% likely found)
Emission-avoidance activity without stored carbon at risk of reversal; permanence is not applicable (rule based on project category, not AI).
Not scored for this activity type (no reversal risk).
Excerpt read: 44,990 characters chosen by keyword, not the whole document
Evidence found for 3 of 4 checks (Q1, Q3, Q4); not found in the excerpt: Q2.
“The verification team assessed whether the data and calculations of GHG emission reductions achieved resulting from the Joint VCS PD & MR. The verification team has checked whether calculations of baseline GHG emissions, project GHG emissions and leakage GHG emissions have been carried out in accordance with the formulae and methods described in the monitoring plan of the Joint VCS PD & MR. Findings CAR 07 raised on this section and closed successfully. Please refer Appendix 2 for further details Conclusion The baseline Emissions for a given year is calculated by multiplying the energy baseline (EB) with the regional grid emission factor. The grid in this case would be the ‘INDIAN Grid’ Formula Used:- BEy = EGPJ,y x EFgrid,CM,y”
“The above estimated emission reduction is confirmed by assessment team via emission reduction calculation spreadsheet. The calculation is conservative and this acceptable to the assessment team.”
“In accordance with the methodology requirement, net electricity supplied by the project activity is obtained from Joint Energy Meter Reading Report issued by State electricity authority which provide input values (apportioned EGexport,y and apportioned EGimport,y), used for calculation of EGPJ,y by the project activity and forms the basis for emission reduction calculation. Electricity export to the grid and import from the grid is metered by main and check tri-vector energy meters. The main meter reading is taken jointly on a fixed day of every month for the preceding month at the delivery point and signed by the representatives of state utility and O&M personnel.”
Excerpt read: 35,343 characters chosen by keyword, not the whole document
Evidence found for 2 of 3 checks (D1, D2); not found in the excerpt: D3.
“The project has neither been registered nor seeking registration under any other GHG programs. The project is seeking registration only in VCS program.”
“Net GHG emission reductions or removals generated by the Project will not be used for compliance with an emissions trading program or to meet binding limits on GHG emissions in any Emission Trading program or other binding limits.”
“The Project has no intend to generate any other form of GHG-related environmental credit for GHG emission reductions or removals claimed under the VCS Program.”
“However it can be crosschecked that PP is not claiming REC benefits, the same can be verified with the REC accreditation body of India31.”
Excerpt read: 26,418 characters chosen by keyword, not the whole document
Evidence found for 3 of 4 checks (S1, S2, S3); not found in the excerpt: S4.
“All the stakeholders have been invited through public notice to attend the stakeholders meeting. The local stakeholders’ consultation meeting was attended by local persons including local villagers, local vendors and technology suppliers. The stakeholders identified by the project participant were local villagers who are the major population of the particular area, local communities and gram panchayat (Village head), panel supplier, project proponent representatives, O&M Team and other people involved in the project. Validation team verified the list of participants who attended the stakeholder meeting and feedback questionnaire and confirms the stakeholders identified are relevant. Validation team verified the list of participants who attended the stakeholder meeting and feedback questionnaire and confirms the stakeholders identified are relevant. The validation team also verified the minutes of meeting to note that no negative comments were received and the same was cross checked with the information obtained during follow up interviews with the stakeholder’s. Moreover, assessment team during the validation site visit also noted that a grievance register is also put onsite for the stakeholder to comment on any grievances during the operation lifetime of the project activity, The grievances from the stakeholder if found suitable will be addressed immediately by the top management and thus the approach is found appropriate for the project activity.”
“All the stakeholders have been invited through public notice to attend the stakeholders meeting. The local stakeholders’ consultation meeting was attended by local persons including local villagers, local vendors and technology suppliers. The stakeholders identified by the project participant were local villagers who are the major population of the particular area, local communities and gram panchayat (Village head), panel supplier, project proponent representatives, O&M Team and other people involved in the project. Validation team verified the list of participants who attended the stakeholder meeting and feedback questionnaire and confirms the stakeholders identified are relevant. Validation team verified the list of participants who attended the stakeholder meeting and feedback questionnaire and confirms the stakeholders identified are relevant. The validation team also verified the minutes of meeting to note that no negative comments were received and the same was cross checked with the information obtained during follow up interviews with the stakeholder’s. Moreover, assessment team during the validation site visit also noted that a grievance register is also put onsite for the stakeholder to comment on any grievances during the operation lifetime of the project activity, The grievances from the stakeholder if found suitable will be addressed immediately by the top management and thus the approach is found appropriate for the project activity.”
“The project activity is expected to have positive impacts and no significant adverse environmental impacts are foreseen. Since, the project activity is an electricity generation from renewable source (i.e. solar energy) therefore no negative impact are envisaged. There is no mandatory legal requirement for carrying out an environmental impact assessment in the host country. The Ministry of Environment, Forests & Climate change (MoEFCC), Government of India (GoI) notification 15 dated 14/09/2006 regarding the requirement of Environment Impact Assessment (EIA) studies states that any project developer in India needs to file an application to the Ministry of Environment and Forests (including a public hearing and an EIA) in case the proposed industry or project is listed in a predefined list. The list includes thirty nine project activities that require EIA studies. The solar power projects are not included in this list and thus an EIA study is not required.”
Every version anchored on Sepolia stays readable: a retirement records the version current when it happened. Each file is hashed in your browser and compared with that version on the contract.
0x4bfa…2fa6(opens Sepolia Etherscan in a new tab)0x5f94…7977(opens Sepolia Etherscan in a new tab)0x816e…1182(opens Sepolia Etherscan in a new tab)0x0635…193e(opens Sepolia Etherscan in a new tab)0xaf1d…ff93(opens Sepolia Etherscan in a new tab)0x88f9…fff7(opens Sepolia Etherscan in a new tab)Signal, not verdict. Each check says whether a specific kind of evidence is present in an excerpt of the submitted documents, not whether the evidence is true. Scores are not an ICVCM assessment, a rating of the project, or a statement about its real-world impact.
Report v6 anchor on Sepolia Etherscan(opens Sepolia Etherscan in a new tab)